CEDA Industry News: Snap Back Story out of the Old Stone Box

Cutter wheel dredge ‘Sylvia’ at work on the TIWAG Langkampfen power dam reservoir
Cutter wheel dredge ‘Sylvia’ at work on the TIWAG Langkampfen power dam reservoir

You might have read the CEDA Industry News1 publication of September and the LinkedIn announcement2. Or, have been present at Session 10, The Story of Safety3 of the CEDA Dredging Days 2024, where I initially recounted my story of misfortune. For the uninitiated, I’ll shortly recount it over here, although the focus will be more on the design problem back than.

Me telling this story at the Safety Session of the CEDA Dredging Days 2024 (Credit: CEDA)
Me telling this story at the Safety Session of the CEDA Dredging Days 2024 (Credit: CEDA)

When I was fresh out of university, working for my previous employer, I was assigned to advise during the commissioning of a bucket wheel dredge in Austria. Here at my website, I’ve already mentioned a very peculiar problem we had with starting the dredge on Monday morning4. The whole dredge was a funny contraption, trying to fulfil the specific requirements set by the customer. The task of the dredge was to clean out the sediment caught in a silt trap5 in front of a power dam to prevent the material flushing through the delicate turbines. Furthermore, the fine sediment should be removed from the system to be sold for beneficial use, but the larger boulders that came along should be rejected from the system. Unless they were very large and stay in place for forming the liner of the silt trap.

General modes of siltation at the usual location in a reservoir

The proposed method was to use a bucket wheel to gobble up the larger stones, but leave the even bigger ones down at the pit floor. Additional advantage of the bucket wheel is that they tend to have a very low resuspension rate which is beneficial for reducing the turbidity in the river and save the dam turbines. However, the larger stones taken by the bucket wheel will not pass the dredge pump. A proven solution to filter out stones for the dredge pump is a so called stone collection box. They come in various executions, but this one was a large cylindrical vessel with a cover on top. Inside was a cage that connected to the inlet and outlet of the vessel. When the cage was filled, the lid was lifted by the crane and the attached cage came out. The cage was swung over to a barge alongside and the stones were unloaded through a trap door. Sounds straightforward, right?

General arrangement of the ladder and suction system on bucket wheel dredge ‘Sylvia’
General arrangement of the ladder and suction system on bucket wheel dredge ‘Sylvia’

The thing is, when you have anything in the suction pipe section, it will create a pressure loss and the pressure in front of the dredge pump becomes lower. Or higher vacuum, as you wish. This is already a problem for an inboard pump when you are working at sea level, even more so when working at altitude. The NPSHr is easily reached. In order to have enough NPSHa, even when the stone collecting box was filling up, it was decided to have a submerged dredge pump for increasing the pre-pressure. Consequently, the stone collecting box would also be placed on the ladder, in front of the dredge pump.

Explanation on NPSHr and NPSHa in mountains and submerged, including stone box
Explanation on NPSHr and NPSHa in mountains and submerged, including stone box

All in itself no problem. The disadvantage is that a submerged stone collecting box should be very strong, big and heavy to withstand the under pressure, although there is very little room around the ladder, the ladder itself becomes quite heavy and bulky and the submerged frontal area increased dramatically, increasing the total drag of the dredge in the fast flowing river current. To mitigate this, the ladder winch, the service crane and the 25 ton forward wire winch were all stacked over each other, so each could do it’s job independently. Although none of us ever did a collision check in the design phase of the dredge. In actual operation, they all were in each others way. When lifting the cover of the stone collecting box, it got caught by the forward wire. When lifting it further, it slipped of the side by the strong drag forces on the wire. I was to first to experience our negligence and got hit on my head when I was to eager to inspect the contents of the box. I blacked out, fell in the frigid water in the ladder well and woke up washed up on the ladder. My colleagues rushed me to the hospital, where I ended up between all sorts of winter sports injuries. Fortunately for me, I am able to recount my story and share it here and through the CEDA Industry News.

Annotated overview of the accident site where the wire slipped from the cover onto my head.
Annotated overview of the accident site where the wire slipped from the cover onto my head.

References

  1. Dredging safety under the spotlight, CEDA
  2. Safety is paramount, CEDA
  3. Welcome to CEDA’s (revamped) Dredging Days 2024
  4. The Dredge That Refused to Work on Monday Morning
  5. A Reservoir of Dredging Opportunities

See also

CEDA Dredging Days 2024: My Presentation On Clay Cutting

Initial clay cutting tests for my PhD project CHiPS
Initial clay cutting tests for my PhD project CHiPS

Next week is the biannual CEDA Dredging Days event1. This time fully focused on presentations, networking and having a good time together with like minded people. Since a long time, it will not be in conjunction with the distractions of the Europort exhibition. Instead, it will be in the impressive WTC Rotterdam. This is an excellent opportunity to share with you the progress of my PhD project on clay cutting at the TU Delft2. As a teaser, I would like to share with you some observations from my literature study, already3. Starting to search for literature via Google results in this:

Literature on clay (Kushim, 3400BC)4
Literature on clay (Kushim, 3400BC)4

When estimating the cutting production of a dredge, the objective is to find the specific cutting energy for that dredge in combination with the soil properties and correctly chosen operational settings. The specific cutting energy is the amount of power needed to excavate a volume of soil from the bottom5. The funny thing is, when you work out the dimensions of the specific cutting energy, the unit is similar to a stress or pressure. So, there should be a direct relation between the specific cutting energy and a soil property. But which one? For cohesive soils as clay, there are: shear strength, cohesion, adhesion, tensile strength, yield strength. The VOUB course6 recommends to use an empirically derived relation between the cohesion and the deformation rate (which in turn is based on the operating settings) for the specific cutting energy.

Specific Cutting Energy Empirical (Bart van der Schrieck, 1996)
Specific Cutting Energy Empirical (Bart van der Schrieck, 1996)

In contrast to this empirical model, one could also start at the displacements of the clay particles and model the implications for the larger continuum mathematically. This has been investigated by Sape Miedema, who has published countless articles and an impressive book on the topic7. Following this through, the estimated specific cutting energy is in the same range as the empirical model. However, on closer inspection, there are some variations on the outer limits of the deformation rate.

Specific Cutting Energy Theoretical (Sape Miedema, 1992)
Specific Cutting Energy Theoretical (Sape Miedema, 1992)

This discrepancy is probably due applying the model under all conditions. Miedema already recommends to check for the validity of the assumptions in the model. At very thin cutting layers, the resulting chip may form a long curl. When cutting thick layers, the blade will cut out chunks. And those cutting types will have different force equilibriums, resulting in different cutting forces. Miedema suggested a three regime map of cutting types, which coincidently resembles the curves found empirically.

Cutting types (Sape Miedema, 1992)
Cutting types (Sape Miedema, 1992)

It appears, there are many more cutting types possible for a myriad of soil properties and operating conditions. However, the published results and proposed models are not directly applicable for the dredging industry. Either the conditions or assumptions differ (dry earth works for example) or parameters or data has been failed to included in the publication. This leads to some white spots in the knowledge that I hope to colour in with my future models and upcoming experiments8.

Clay cutting test rig at DDE in Nijkerk
Clay cutting test rig at DDE in Nijkerk

References

  1. Welcome to CEDA’s (revamped) Dredging Days 2024
  2. Personal Announcement: Going Back To School To Cut Some Clay
  3. CEDA Announcement of my presentation, LinkedIn
  4. What was the first (known) maths mistake? Matt Parker
  5. Experiencing The Cutting Edge Of Dredging Technology
  6. VOUB Cursus 1998, Deel X, hoofdstuk 12, VBKO
  7. The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model, Sape Miedema
  8. Mechanical excavation of clayey soils, a review of the physical phenomena occurring, Mark Winkelman et al (CEDA Dredging Days 2024)

See also

Second Thoughts On The Energy Transition Panel At the Latest CEDA Dredging Days

Energy transition panel discussion CEDA Dredging Days 2021 (Credit: CEDA)
Energy transition panel discussion CEDA Dredging Days 2021 (Credit: CEDA)

The CEDA Dredging Days are long gone1. Maybe some of you still have a faint memory of the innovative online event. After this event I was quite occupied and not able to do a proper review. I did even miss the opportunity for the traditional new years welcome post. My apologies, more to that another time. Concerning the Dredging Days. I still kept some nagging thoughts about the Energy transition panel discussion that I want to share with you. And the recent invitation for participating in the CEDA Commission on Decarbonisation is another good motivation2.

On the second day of the conference there was a session with a panel discussion on the ‘Energy transition in the dredging industry’. Several experts in the dredging community were invited to present their perspective on the energy transition. From the legislation side (Dagmar Nelissen, CE Delft), clients (Joris Vijverberg, Rijkswaterstaat), suppliers (Benny Mestemaker, Royal IHC) and contractors (Sven Kramer, Van Oord). The panel was moderated by Paul Vercruijsse from the CEDA Working Group on Energy Efficiency3.

The take-aways of the panellists were amongst others: ‘No single solution for all, Transitional fuels should be flexible, Transition should be facilitated by regulation, There might be a financial objection to change.’ Along these lines, there were polls on the perspective of the audience. The response to two of the polls surprised the panellists.

Results on the polls for rate of transition (l) and preferred energy carrier (r) (Credit:CEDA)
Results on the polls for rate of transition (l) and preferred energy carrier (r) (Credit:CEDA)

As I was present there, I have my own perspective on the discussion. First the rate of transition. The panel was surprised that the audience was expecting a transition ahead of the IMO planning. I was responding to our own national situation. Currently I see so some initiatives to convert dredges and projects to electric drives, that it could be possible4,5,6. But I expect to see a next generation of newbuilds soon that will be virtually or completely decarbonized.

Well to propeller emissions (Credit: CEDA)
Well to propeller emissions (Credit: CEDA)

The other surprise is was the preference for hydrogen as the final fuel of the future. Although all the alternatives do have better performance, are easier to store or downright cheaper according to the experts in the panel. That might be very well, but I think the answer is in the presentation by Benny Mestemaker. It will simply be the fuel with the lowest emission to supply and use. In the end we will have to go to that dot on the horizon. And I do see other advantages where my opinion differs from the experts. The complaints of the panel was the complete lack of infrastructure for hydrogen at both the project sites and the vessels themselves.

Concerning the infrastructure near the project site. Yes, there are no installations yet. However, the thing is. You can find renewably generated hydrogen everywhere. As long as you have access to sun, wind and water. And that is exactly where most dredging projects are happening. Off course, there is no factory yet, but that is outdated philosophy. There will be movable plants available that will create a new market. e.g. I am very hopeful of initiatives like ‘Solar Duck’7. They can roam the projects delivering tailor made hydrogen production, right where you need it.

Floating solar power plant (Credit: SolarDuck)
Floating solar power plant (Credit: SolarDuck)

Concerning the vessels. Yes, the installation to sail the vessel on hydrogen will take up a lot of valuable cargo space. But, that is no technical problem. We’ve had technologies that required an even bigger chunk of the vessel deadweight: coal burning steam ships. The big equalizer is: there was no other solution. Everybody was using it. And that is the same here. I think there will be no other solution than to use hydrogen, as it is completely emission free. One of my perspectives on design choices: select the solution that you know will solve the problem!
Transition schedule to convert to fossil fuel free dredging equipment

Transition schedule to convert to fossil fuel free dredging equipment
Transition schedule to convert to fossil fuel free dredging equipment

References

  1. CEDA Dredging Days 2021, CEDA
  2. Invitation to CEDA Commission on Decarbonisation (CCD), CEDA
  3. CEDA Working Group on Energy Efficiency (WGEE), CEDA
  4. Transitiepad Kustlijnzorg en Vaargeulonderhoud, Rijkswaterstaat
  5. Zero Emission Dredging Hub van start, EDB Drechtsteden
  6. Complete zandfabriek zo hoog als een flatgebouw dobbert ineens in de voorhaven van Deest, De Gelderlander
  7. Electrifying the world with offshore floating solar, SolarDuck

See also

We Choose To Adopt Energy Transition, But How Will We Succeed?

Comment

CEDA will provide access to the panel discussion shortly. Dredging Days attendees can still (re-) watch it on the conference platform.